While this article is from the Haitian News, it is a view of how just one country is able to benefit by investment in distance learning. In the US, we have so many Universities, but how many people can physically access them? Outside of urban areas or suburbs with Universities, so much more is now possible. Outside of the US, it is even more the case. Regardless of how we put down our higher education system because of its problems – and of course they exist – a US Education is still the dream for so many people around the world. Access to that education online is the fundamental reason we need to take advantage of it. Education is part of the fabric that defines us in this country. Here’s hoping we can make it more affordable so that not only others in this country, but people around the world can take advantage of what our “broken” education system affords. Aspects of the system may be broken, but learning and research that is generated? Priceless.
“We’re seeing a positive trend of Haitians pursuing better careers and higher educations in recent years. The economy is supporting this new trend.”
Source: Distance Learning and How It Helps You Achieve More | The Haitian Times
This is an ongoing conversation, often discussed by Sherry Turkle (“Alone Together”) and others. Killing the art of conversation? Or changing how we interact? There was a recent article posted on Slate about the Exact Date Telephone Conversations Disappeared which discussed the migration to text and when it happened. In this article, Steve correctly shares the different types of conversation facilitated by technology. It seems the big unstated question here is – what do we consider conversation? I think the most important shift has been from the synchronous to the asynchronous, regardless of modality. Text, posts, tweets – we don’t have to answer immediately. We have responses that we can reflect upon (usually) before answering. How does that change conversation? In an online discussion, particularly in an online classroom, this is often cited as an advantage to the learner. I agree. One who would be reluctant to raise their hand in a classroom would have time to answer a question thoughtfully online. I would say that technology has changed conversation. Better? Worse? No….just different.
Source: Is technology killing the art of conversation? | Learning with ‘e’s
Excellent article by George Couros. I often use the phrase “Pedagogy Before Technology” and am mindful of the ways technology can get in between the learner and what is being taught. This example is terrific though. Sometimes technology appears that gives us new ideas about pedagogical methodologies. Virtual reality is certainly one of those – which he refers to when he talks about Pokemon Go. Thoughtful article worth reading, link below.
Source: Pedagogy Before Technology | Connected Principals
From one of my favorite sites, a list of apps and videos for your Google Cardboard – fun! It was crowdsourced at ISTE – the International Society for Technology in Education. No better place. Grab your cardboard! I am always looking for new things to do with mine.
Source: Free Technology for Teachers: A Crowd-sourced List of Google Cardboard Apps & Videos
One of my favorite adult learning theories, Double-Loop Learning, coined by Chris Argyris, is in an article on +TeachThought
. Always interesting that theories traditionally put in the “adult” silo are more and more often applicable to any stage of learning. Perhaps it is only the third loop, not referred to here, that is meant for adults? Learning meant for adults and for K12 students (traditional) is getting less and less differentiated.
Loops in Triple-Loop Learning
1 – Are we doing things right?
2 – Are we doing the right things?
3 – How do we decide what is right?
<<Learning Theories: Double-Loop Learning by Steve Wheeler, Associate Professor, Plymouth Institute of Education This is the second in my series of short blog posts on important theories of learning.>>
Source: Learning Theories: Double-Loop Learning
This article caught my eye in my Feedly reader today. While the author aptly describes bad e-learning, there is also bad classroom learning – and vice-versa. Is one better than the other? I live technology, e-learning, and online learning but I will still say that you can’t compare the two. The only comparison? They are both learning. Better? Worse? Because of modality? Delivery method, in my opinion, does not make learning better or worse. This is complex and contextual concept…..but the article did catch my eye and I do agree that powerpoint slides posted on a site are not a good thing in most cases. A good article to read regardless. But add context, content, learner, facilitator/instructor/motivation….the list goes on.
<<learning extends beyond borders with more advantages than traditional learning, argues Ralph LaFontaine.>>
Source: Why e-learning is better than face-to-face learning
I am so happy to see Tony Bates’ article because, even years after MOOCs appeared on the scene, articles still confuse MOOCs with for-credit online courses. They are not the same. We access both with a computer or device, that is true. They are both focused on learning. Everything else? Tony says it well….
Online learning for beginners: 3. ‘Aren’t MOOCs online learning?’ | Tony Bates